ML Archiv: Re: [OM] (no subject)

Subject:	Re: [OM] (no subject)
From:	Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 29 Dec 2011 16:45:25 -0500

And . . . we have a winner!


On Dec 29, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Chris Barker wrote:

> Was that "whom", Andrew?
> 
> :-)
> 
> Chris
> 
> On 29 Dec 2011, at 20:32, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> 
>> Now, who haven't I insulted today?

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] (no subject), (continued) Re: [OM] (no subject), Chris Trask Re: [OM] (no subject), Ken Norton Re: [OM] (no subject), Chris Trask Re: [OM] (no subject), Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] (no subject), Bill Pearce Re: [OM] (no subject), Ken Norton Re: [OM] (no subject), Bill Pearce Re: [OM] (no subject), Ian Manners Re: [OM] (no subject), Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] (no subject), Chris Barker Re: [OM] (no subject), Bob Whitmire <= Re: [OM] (no subject), Ken Norton Re: [OM] (no subject), Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] (no subject), Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] (no subject), Chris Barker [OM] FTL origin, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] FTL origin, Chris Barker Re: [OM] FTL origin, John Hermanson Re: [OM] FTL origin, Chris Crawford Re: [OM] FTL origin, Ian Manners Re: [OM] FTL origin, Chuck Norcutt

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] IMG: I want you should be healthy, Chris Barker
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] (no subject), Ken Norton
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] (no subject), Chris Barker
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] (no subject), Ken Norton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]