Subject: | [OM] 2 orchids, 1 new stack |
---|---|
From: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:14:56 -0500 (EST) |
Interesting analysis and thanks for the suggestions on the crop/mods--will implement them when get a chance. I was time limited with these and didn't analyze the stack thoroughly or clone out as many artifacts. There are always halos and other artifacts and the feathering of the merged images can always be seen at very close inspection. This is somewhat an adjustable parameter within the software. My >20 image "Moose stack" is yet to be processed. I try and make it easy for the software and have a hard edge onto which it can latch easily. I should try the "pyramid method" of stacking to avoid this limitation. Big Foot announced in May 2001. Is that vintage/older glass already? Not produced since about 2007. Hard to find MTF data on FF but here is one set: http://tinyurl.com/39wy8s Big Foot's OOF super smooth transitions begin to lose the magic after F5.6. The Zuiko 135 macro is a super nice lens to use for this too and using a focusing rail vs the helicoid --results in less alignment issues. A gradual deep stack can fool the alignment part though the "strict alignment" macro seems to fix much of it. Bob thought the prints held up fine at 6X9 but I want them to hold up on a large monitor at Moose scrutiny level at some point. Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Cambridge and London, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Hail Storm Follow-up, Jim Nichols |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] 2 orchids, 1 new stack, usher99 |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Nathan's PAD 13/11/2011: winter in El Campello, Nathan Wajsman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |