Subject: | Re: [OM] Another Film vs digital debate of note |
---|---|
From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayne.harridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:55:09 +1000 |
It's just an optical illusion. ...Wayne > > The confusing thing about silver vs digital is that digital is many > times better than theory predicts it "should" be. I've never seen a > satisfactory answer to this seeming paradox. Nor have I seen anyone > attempt to rationally address the question. > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Overextending your reach, Jim Nichols |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: eBay Display Format, Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Another Film vs digital debate of note, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Another Film vs digital debate of note, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |