Travlin' Moose writes:
--Yup, much of the problem is with overexposure and low contrast. Also
not the
--sharpest of images, but not too bad.
--<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Beckrich/Up_Close.htm>
--Highlight clipping is only in the grass at the top, so it's easy to
adjust, and
--deconvolution perks it up quite a bit.
--With such a small version, I didn't even look to try to see how much
may be
--motion blur and how much just softness.
Ahh, the Moose returned just in the nick of time. Not too bad an
image afterall.
I recall some testing of crummy
2X TC's---images barely better than a straight crop sans TC--now that
is a lousy one.
The better performing 200F is an elongated design but stll 6 elements
like the smaller 01F--apparently easier to correct aberrations
in the longer version.
Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|