>
> It is quite possible that it is a Soligor. I got it used when I picked up
> some M42 lenses to use on my Spotmatic, later on a Fujica. It should turn
> up one of these days, but I'm not sure how to define its construction.
>
> If it does turn up, it would be interesting to compare images from the
> Takumar 135/3.5 plus the 2X with those from my Leica Telyt-R 250/4. That
> should define the usefulness of the 2X.
>
If it is a Soligor, that would account for the clarity. Was it somewhat
short, meaning shorter than the diameter, or longer? My Soligor is about
1.5 times the diameter.
Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|