Peter
That's great; I'm sure that you will enjoy using the E-30; I nearly bought one
several times, in place of my E-3.
I don't think that you mentioned those reports in your previous posts, but I
don't find that my K-5 has much of a problem, depending on what sort of low
light you mean, of course — I don't use mine in near-darkness, but I use it up
to ISO3200 with no problem. I am so confident of its capabilities that I use
it on auto-ISO much of the time.
Which is something that I didn't normally use on my E-1 or E-3, when I had
them. But I switched because my shoulders are giving me problems and the
lightness and compactness of the K-5 is a bit of a relief.
Chris
On 24 Sep 2011, at 23:02, Peter Klein wrote:
> I had originally planned on dumping the E-system in favor of a Pentax
> K-5 and a couple of primes. But the main reason for doing this would
> have been for low-light work. The trouble is, there are too many reports
> of the K-5 having autofocus problems in low tungsten light--precisely
> the conditions under which I would want to use it. We'll see if Pentax
> solves the autofocus issues in the next model.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|