Ken
I continue to find that very interesting. You write something like it every so
often, and it is surprising for me.
I suppose that I moved on from the E-1 because I wanted IS, but I was very
pleased with the E-1 when I had it.
Chris
On 21 Sep 2011, at 15:56, Ken Norton wrote:
> Last night I shot an event with the E-1 with PanaLeica 14-50. It was quite
> dark and I had no flash--my entire portable flash kit is on loan this week.
> I did need to crank the ISO up to obscene levels and I shot in-camera JPEG.
> Are the pictures junk as a result? Hardly! They met the purpose and provided
> the visual recording of the event that met and exceeded the usage. These
> days, hardly anything is displayed beyond 600 pixel width and when printed,
> the images are rarely larger than a wallet print. I can lament all I want
> that I don't have the best camera around for high ISO stuff, but the fact
> is, the E-1, in the right hands, is still better than anything else anybody
> else had. Absolutely nobody is complaining about the results.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|