I disgree, at least in part. There's not a great deal of it but the
background bud certainly does show bokeh and it's very nice.
Chuck Norcutt
On 9/12/2011 11:04 AM, Chris Trask wrote:
>>
>> Here you are, Chuck, if you have time and inclination to examine:
>>
>> <http://images.threeshoes.biz/Flowers/Flowers/i-P4Vgfwz/0/M/D2011IMG1446-Cosmo-M.jpg>
>>
>> Taken with a 35/2.8 macro on my K-5. There might be some subject
>> movement, but we have the closing stages of Hurricane Katya
>> coasting up the British Isles, I gather.
>>
>> The bokeh is pretty smooth, and less distracting I grant you. The
>> camera and lens combination are a pleasure to use, even though
>> it's a bit long for a standard lens, it makes a well balanced
>> piece of kit, both optically and physically.
>>
>
> Yes, you can just barely discern the hexagonal shapes.
>
> In the earlier photo by Moose:
>
> http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Home/Garden_Summer_2011&image=_MG_1852cria60.jpg
>
> you don't see any bokeh items as the background has been sufficiently
> darkened. This photo of his is actually a nicely composed artsy photo of
> bee, flower, and flower buds without background distractions.
>
> Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
