Here you are, Chuck, if you have time and inclination to examine:
<http://images.threeshoes.biz/Flowers/Flowers/i-P4Vgfwz/0/M/D2011IMG1446-Cosmo-M.jpg>
Taken with a 35/2.8 macro on my K-5. There might be some subject movement, but
we have the closing stages of Hurricane Katya coasting up the British Isles, I
gather.
The bokeh is pretty smooth, and less distracting I grant you. The camera and
lens combination are a pleasure to use, even though it's a bit long for a
standard lens, it makes a well balanced piece of kit, both optically and
physically.
Chris
(prepared for any other criticisms, of course).
On 12 Sep 2011, at 11:19, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> But I think you've just emphasized my reason for disliking the bokeh.
> You've noticed the bokeh rather than the flower.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 9/12/2011 1:15 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> I was just thinking how cool (even discreet) the bokeh looked, Chuck.
>> I suppose it's one of those facets that you prefer or you don't
>> (similar to the mirror lens discussion).
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
