I am with Moose here, and I have the X100. For me, the APS-C sensor was the
major selling point. I would never have paid €1000 for a camera with a P&S
sized sensor.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
YNWA
On Sep 3, 2011, at 3:07 AM, Moose wrote:
> On 9/2/2011 3:47 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> Looks interesting. X100 with a hopefully nice zoom and same good sensor.
>
> Nope.
>
>
> X100 is APS-C (23.6 x 15.8 mm)
>
> X10 is 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm), much smaller, although a bit bigger than the
> G12, 1/1.7" (7.49 x 5.52 mm)
>
> Still no way to get around the laws of physics and make a smaller camera with
> the same sized sensor while adding a fast
> zoom lens.
>
>
>
>
>> 85% OVF, ??
>>
>
> I wonder is it is as useless as the G series.
>
>> Wish it had oversized multi-aspect ratio sensor and articulated screen.
>>
>
> Can't do that and maintain sensor and camera size.
>
> No Free Lunch Moose
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|