I seem to recall seeing that one. It passes muster for me. Doesn't cross the
taxonomic line. <g>
--Bob
On Sep 2, 2011, at 12:25 AM, Moose wrote:
> On 8/31/2011 3:03 PM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
>> Well, better is a relative term. I'm not a butterfly guy, with expectations
>> of seeing all of the, ah, taxonomic details. I like pretty pictures, and I
>> react viscerally to one I like. I do recall Moose's pics, but not well
>> enough to pass any sort of comment along. I just saw yours, and liked it
>> very much.
>
> As I've said recently, I rather like the effect of cropping the E-1 image a
> great deal and then the effect of whatever
> processing Jim is applying.
>
> Mine are much more technically "good", being cropped less from four times the
> pixels, but as you say, "better is a
> relative term", and I like both.
>
> Here's one of mine, shot about 10 days ago.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=California/Sonoma_Mendocino_Coast/River_Bend&image=_MG_2871croofm.jpg>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
