I hear about it in a workshop I watched on DVD. The folks talking were Mack
Holbert of Nash Editions and John Paul Caponigro. Both of them said they used
the default setting about 75 percent of the time. I did, too. Every now and
then I'd do manual settings and was surprised at how well it worked. Never got
that mushy noise-control look I got with other software. I'm waiting for the
64-bit version.
--Bob
On Aug 7, 2011, at 6:17 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> BW wrties:
> I used
>
> http://www.imagenomic.com/nwpg.aspx
>
>> until I went 64 bit. Now I try to keep the noise down. <g>
>> It's a damn fine plug-in, and I've used Neat Image and Noise Ninja,
> etc.>
>> A bit pricey, but . . .
> --Bob
>
> Thanks,
> Looks very flexible with separate controls for shadows, highlights,
> midtones. It can be adjusted by which colors it works on and freq of
> noise as well. Little reason to use multiple noise reduction layers.
> It appears to be more manual until it learns what you want. I looked at
> the tutorial video.
> Perhaps a noise zapper comparison is in order. It is no more $ than the
> Neat image plug-in that works on 64 bit OS.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|