Subject: | Re: [OM] olympus Digest, Vol 33, Issue 21 |
---|---|
From: | David Thatcher <davidt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:31:47 +0930 |
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 06:53:26PM +0200, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > Will Lightroom or Microsoft Office run under those great free OSs? And > I mean really run, not in some kludge kind of way. This is my yardstick measure of a how serious a software vendor is. if there isn't a linux or unix port of the package, then they are just not a serious contender in that market space. They may very well be successful $-wise, but they are just not worthy of serious consideration (whether I'm buying or recommending to clients). The fact that these people have ported a 'doze app to (or nativley written for) osX, means that they CAN do this very easily - but have made the decision not to, making them contemptible as well. :) Fortunately, in most cases someone has written something better under one of those great free OSs - and those are usually free, too. davidt -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Plitvicka Jezera, Wiliam Wagenaar |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Plitvicka Jezera, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] olympus Digest, Vol 33, Issue 21, Nathan Wajsman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] olympus Digest, Vol 33, Issue 21, Nathan Wajsman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |