Form the lens construction diagram, I always thought the Macro 50/3.5
to be a minor variation of the Tessar design. Tessars have almost
universally good (smooth) out-of-focus areas, your image illustrates
this satisfactorily in my opinion. On second thought, your image has
so little out of focus, it's not even really worth discussing its bokeh!
The whole world seems to have gone bokeh nuts - just forget about it
and focus on what the image itself conveys!
Dawid
On 14 Jul 2011, at 7:17 AM, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> handheld Olympus OM 1n @ 1/60 sec., Zuiko Macro 50mm ƒ/3,5 @ ƒ/8,
> Eyecup 1.
> film: Fuji Provia 100F
>
> exposure done on Spring 2009 (September - October, a rainy
> spring ... )
>
> linear contrast curve preset only. downsized to 1024 using FM SIPro 2.
>
> bad bokeh?
>
> <http://www.flickr.com/photos/fernando_gonzalez_gentile/5935605205/in/photostream/lightbox/
>
> >
>
> Fernando
>
>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|