A simple but beautiful image of a beautiful flower. I am curious, how
do you
guys think the OM Zuiko 250mm f/2.0 compares to the Telyt 250/4 ? On
the one
hand, there is all the (anecdotal?) evidence that, at least by the
1980s, there
was simply nothing as good as the 250/2, period.
On the other hand, logic dictates that (usually) a slower lens design
will have
less aberrations. I would love to see a head-to-head test. If I had a
four thirds
body, I could do the one half of the test, but alas - film only for me
for the
moment.
regards,
DAWID LOUBSER
Systems Architect
Travellinck
+27 (011) 236-4901 (ext 219)
dawid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.travellinck.com/
On 19 Jun 2011, at 9:07 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
> While the bloom of the St. John's Wort bush stands out because of
> its color, it is also difficult to photograph. I decided to try the
> Leica Telyt-R 250/4 and see how it would do the job. It turned out
> better than expected.
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/St+Johns+Wort.jpg.html
>
> E-510 with Leica Telyt-R 250/4
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
