I hear your rationale and could also tell what it was. But, for my 2
cetns, I still consider it a distraction because it attracted almost all
of my attention rather than the main part of the image. Maybe a
different case if the background was very slightly brighter.
Chuck Norcutt
On 5/24/2011 8:51 AM, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> Yes, I wondered what to do with it, and decided to leave it as it
> showed, since it is the very border of a thick and very green leave,
> lightened (most probably) by the flash at my right.
> It has its reason to be there, so I left it instead of cloning out.
> Thought it made the background more 'real', despite distracting.
> In fact, it drove your curiosity to the background, my friend :-) -
> that's not distracting: I'd call it 'interesting'.
>
> One more note: as noted several times before, uploads to FB remain
> lacking; and resizing to 720, in this case, didn't allow NImage to
> find an uniform Y area.
> So the version uploaded to FB was the 1024 version, same as the Flickr one.
> Brian: resizing to 720 sometimes works, sometimes doesn't: FB is not
> still a good place for photos, though I use it anyway.
>
> Fernando.
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Chuck Norcutt
> <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I like it but there is a very distracting white "thread" at left which
>> needs to be dealt with.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|