Have you tried the Viewer 2? It is much better than the original Viewer. As
far as I remember it has most if not all the features of Studio. But there
is a problem with Viewer 2 under my computer setup, when I adjusted a large
batch and try to convert them it sometimes failed to do the conversion. The
other problem is it does not save adjusted setting, you have to redo from
start when you want to get back to the RAW image to do adjustment again.
BTW, the color errors in CS4 RAW convertion really make me worry. I will
only use Canyon DPP and Olympus Viewer 2 for RAW.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 4:21 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] (OT) Canyon Software
>> But of course, nothing matches Olympus's software for clunkiness, in my
>> view.
>
>
> I disagree. But I am a Studio user. There is a difference between
> Studio and Viewer in how it allows you to batch process as well as
> apply settings and tweeks to groups of images. The sort/compare screen
> is also very good. On my machine it is also about 4X faster than
> Lightroom. As brilliant as Lightroom is, it is also one of the
> clunkiest programs ever written. Simply bizaar on so many levels.
>
> Alas, it has no generic RAW converter, so it is Olympus-centric. My
> cameras speak multiple languages, so that is a major showstopper
> unless I'm hanging loose with JPEGs.
>
> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|