Also very nice. I was a bit surprised to see the water blur at 1/2000
second but it was done with a long focal length and perhaps couldn't
look like anything else even if all motion was frozen.
Chuck Norcutt
On 5/8/2011 4:13 AM, Moose wrote:
> On 5/7/2011 11:20 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> That has come out very well, Moose; it's a lovely shot, with
>> depth.
>
> Thanks, Chris! Maybe it was worth the trouble. ;-)
>
> I see I got my fingers crossed a bit. _MG_0565, the waterfall, should
> have been attached to the story about running back up the road.
>
> The less obvious subject for the imaginary competition with NG was
> supposed to be _MG_0330, this one.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=California/Yosemite/Yosemite_2011/Yosemite_Valley&image=_MG_0330ia50.jpg>
>
> A. Confused Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
