That's a nice one, Jim. I think if it were mine, and because it was shot with
an E-510 thus containing many pixels, I would go for a much tighter crop really
zeroing in on the bird. That it's on a feeder will still be obvious, but it's a
beautiful bird, and from what I can see you've got enough detail in the critter
to hold a tight crop.
--Bob
On May 5, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
> The Red-Headed Woodpecker was plentiful in the 1930s and 1940s, but is
> infrequently seen in our parts these days. There is a pair in the
> neighborhood, and occasionally one can be seen having a snack at one of the
> feeders. I looked out the window and saw the bright head today, and,
> slipping out quickly, got one shot before it left.
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Red+Headed+Woodpecker.jpg.html
>
> Comments and critiques welcomed.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
