Ian,
At least around here,, where the whole evolution thing was a statewide
issue, the Darwin fish was made as a reaction specifically to the issue, the
teaching of Darwin. Not Pearce or Manners, just Darwin. So, it fits.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Nichols
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 4:45 PM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 19/4/2011: atheist Copenhagen
On 20 April 2011 20:39, Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The first response to the fish symbol I recall seeing was an exact copy,
> except the fish had feet. I almost wet my pants. That was a while ago.
> Years, in fact.
They should have left it like that, or at least put "evolution" inside
rather than "Darwin". Science is not about personality cults, after
all.
--
Stand firm for what you believe in, until and unless logic and experience
prove you wrong. Remember: when the emperor looks naked, the emperor *is*
naked, the truth and a lie are not "sort-of the same thing" and there is
no aspect, no facet, no moment of life that can't be improved with pizza.
-Daria Morgendorffer
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|