Beat me to it :-) and perhaps better done by using x.x
On 3/29/11 11:01 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Thanks for that, Ken. I didn't know that you could change the subnet; hang
>> on, is that a subnet or is the 255.255 etc . . . the subnet?
> 255.255.x.x. is the subnet mask.
>
> I'm in the midst of studying for the CCNA and I'm completely convinced
> that if Cicso had designed their junk correctly in the first place
> that there wouldn't be a need for 3/4 of the information on the CCNA.
>
> Worthless pig of equipment...
>
> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|