Remind me: Who was it that said, "If it's more than XX feet from the car;
it's not photogenic."?
'cause I'm sure starting to feel that way. I just realized that not one of
the shots I've made
in the last two months has been out of the yard. OK, big yard (4 acres) but
still...
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Chuck Norcutt <
chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't know how a couple of pounds of any lens hanging off the camera
> can be "better balanced". But the Tokina with 5D attached is well
> balanced when setting on it's own tripod mount... which is also where I
> support it when using it handheld. :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 3/28/2011 5:55 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> >> If it helps I'll tell you that my Tokina AT-X AF 80-200/2.8 in Canon
> >> mount is so big and heavy that it's one of those that never gets used
> >> unless I'm no more than 100 yards/meters from the car. :-)
> >
> >
> > LOL, but we're not talking about the Tokina. The Tamron is a bit nicer
> > of a lens and slightly better balanced.
> >
> > But still big and heavy.
> >
> > AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|