Thanks for the advice, Moose. It makes sense to me, now that I understand
more of the process.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Friday Tulip - Jim N.
> On 3/27/2011 9:37 AM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> . . .
>> However, I believe you are correct about the gallery software. I
>> examined
>> another image that I uploaded as a tiff, and it shows that it is
>> displayed
>> in the gallery as a jpeg image. So, I have just been kidding myself
>> about
>> any differences that I thought I was noticing.
>
> It's not just that gallery. The whole web is built around images of 8 bits
> or less. There may be specialty apps, but
> standard browsers won't view a TIFF. Click on one and you get download
> options, not a pretty picture to gaze at.
>
> So the gallery had no choice but to convert it. Accepting TIFFs, PSDs,
> etc. is just a convenience for the person
> uploading images.
>
> But you may indeed be seeing some subtle difference, as their conversion
> engine may not do exactly the same thing as
> your engine and settings. Best to get the JPEG as you like it, and upload
> that.
>
> Perfect Image Moose
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|