Actually, there is an easier way, placing the burden on the person posting the
photos rather than on (potential) viewers, which is how it should be.
When a member of Facebook posts photos, there is always an option to provide a
URL that allows people to see the pictures, regardless of whether they are on
Facebook or not, for example:
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=265077&id=1226811003&l=21a87b4bd7
Certainly, nobody should be forced to "log in" or "sign up" for anything just
to look at pictures.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
YNWA
On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:11 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Thanks for the FB info. I enjoy seeing Brian's photos but not badly
> enough to do that. I wouldn't go through that even see my own photos. :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 3/27/2011 9:58 AM, orink@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> I noticed the photos had been placed in Facebook. I just signed in
>> with my Facebook ID and was directed right to the photos.
>>
>> If one is not signed in as a Facebook member, it becomes more
>> problematic to see the photos. If you can get to Brian's homepage by
>> doing a search for his Facebook page - usually, by entering his name,
>> you still must select the correct " Brian Swale" from the list of
>> Brians shown you. Once you get to his FB page, if you see photos as a
>> choice, FB is letting you know that you, even as a non-member, can
>> look at his photos. If you don't see photos as a choice, then you
>> can't get to them. A FB member has a large list of possible "viewers"
>> that he can choose to view his various page entries.
>> _________________________________________________________ -----
>> Original Message ----- From: "Chuck
>> Norcutt"<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Olympus Camera
>> Discussion"<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011
>> 8:30:26 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: [OM] (OM) OT
>> Before and after photos of Christchurch
>>
>> Can't see it behind the sign-in wall.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> On 3/27/2011 8:27 AM, Brian Swale wrote:
>>> A set of before and after photos of old central city places of the
>>> Christchurch City I once knew. Truly shocking.
>>> https://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=277420&id=663578868
>>>
>>> I'll be hard put to recognise the place when I visit again.
>>>
>>> I have just learned that my former home for 30 years has to be
>>> demolished and rebuilt under insurance.
>>>
>>> Brian Swale.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|