Hi again, Nicholas and all,
Forgot to edit my reply in full...
From: Nicholas Herndon <nherndon@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Agreed re: the 100/2 vs. the 85/2...but I do think it's sharper
>
Well, the 100 _is_ sharper, esp. wide open. But after processing, or at f/4
and smaller apertures, I can't see enough difference to justify the much
bigger size (and the purchase!)
>and the bokeh is better. Not by a lot, but it is noticeable.
>
I still have little experience with this lens, besides the purely technical
test... but, for instance, the 90/2 Macro does have better bokeh (and esp.
3D separation) than the 85 -- not that the 85 is any bad on this respect, of
course! Thus, that seems reasonable to me.
Cheers,
--
Carlos J. Santisteban Salinas
IES Turaniana (Roquetas de Mar, Almeria)
<http://cjss.sytes.net/>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|