I know that the OM 20/3.5, as well as the 38/3.5 does cover 4x5in
(I played around with it on my Linhof the other day - just composing,
no images made).
Still, my gut feel says the 80/4 (which I do own) and 135/4.5
(which I do not) won't quite cover it, but that's just gut feel.
Would be nice to verify it, as well as what the quality is like
across the frame. I can mount RMS-mount lenses (20mm, 38mm) on my
Linhof because I have a shutter / lensboard with RMS mount, but how
do I mount an OM-mount lens? I guess the only option is to butcher
a lensboard and an OM mount from a camera or extension tube, etc.
D.
On 10 Mar 2011, at 10:28 PM, Sawyer, Edward wrote:
> I haven't yet. I suspect it might cover 4x5 but probably with no
> movements.
>
>
> On 3/10/11 5:16 AM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> <olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> So, did you try it? If so, what were the results?
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|