I agree, Frank.
The lens is delightfully tiny, and I doubt that I would be able to tell the
difference in quality.
But it's still pretty pricey . . .
Chris
On 9 Mar 2011, at 20:21, Frank Wijsmuller wrote:
> I would take the m.zuiko 9-18mm, not the 7-14mm.
> .
> It's range is more versatile (I expect to use 18mm, being close to standard,
> more then 7mm). It's size and weight is more in line with the m43 promise:
> small (when not extended), light (actually the 7-14mm is close to twice as
> heavy), unobtrusive, protectable with a filter (this IS important if you use
> a camera as an 'always with you camera', which I consider a major m43
> advantage).
>
> Regarding quality, I doubt that many people on this list can identify
> pictures by the two lenses in everyday use. The difference between good and
> best is overrated, I think ;-). Too much pixelpeeping and not enough
> creativity, I'd say.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|