I like both versions, I must admit. Nathan's habit is to shoot and accept what
he gets (using RAW), I would guess. And there's a gentleness about the image
and its tones which I find attractive. Moose's suggestions, both of crop and
detail is interesting but not necessarily "better" of course.
I wouldn't have described Nathan's title as a challenge, more a name to suit
his view of the image.
Chris
On 25 Feb 2011, at 04:17, Moose wrote:
> On 2/24/2011 12:02 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>> In this image, I really push the limits of the GF-1, both in terms of light
>> gathering and dynamic range. But I kind of like it:
>>
>> http://www.greatpix.eu/All/Picture-A-Day/4253606_netUM#1197501562_Wj3fd-O-LB
>
> Why, oh why do you issue these challenges, Nathan?
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Wajsman/Philippa.htm>
>
> I'm not even suggesting that my alternate version is better, only that there
> is a lot more 'light' and dynamic range in
> that image than you think. If you shot RAW, there's may be even more.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|