Re: [OM] Wow, is the 35/2.8 really this good?

[Moose]

On 2/22/2011 6:19 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> I'm not a fan of 35mm especially the Zuiko 35/2.8, I have focus problem with 
> both 35/2 and 2.8 while the 40/2 and 24/2 seem much better, don't know why.
>
> Anyway, here are some Zuiko test shots made today:
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/IMG_1303_3528atF28.JPG
> http://www.accura.com.hk/IMG_1304_3528atF56.JPG
> http://www.accura.com.hk/IMG_1305_352atF2.JPG
> http://www.accura.com.hk/IMG_1306_352atF28.JPG
> http://www.accura.com.hk/IMG_1307_352atF56.JPG
>

Thanks for going to the effort. As it happens, I have both those 35 mm lenses*, 
but don't feel like straining my eyes at 
details at the moment. Do you have a summary comparison review?

Moose

* Thanks again, Tom, if you are still around. I used it for the last TOPE.
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/