On 2/23/2011 10:28 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Interesting, the difference between one who took it or was there vs. one
>> viewing it without that full physical context.
>> Chalk Lake is without sound or flowing water - to me. Labeled as a lake, and
>> without any visual clues about moving water
>> that would make noise, I can't know that. So my reaction is the one a
>> gallery or web viewer unfamiliar with the subject
>> might well have.
>>
>> It's from that viewpoint that I chose the tighter crop.
>
> Good perspective, Moose. I will ... --but it would have needed to be a bit
> larger. Sometimes, the constraints of 800 pixels is stiffling. On most
> computer monitors, this comes in somewhere around a 5x7" image size. Alas,
> many pictures demand to be displayed much larger. I could, but then people
> like Brian would never be able to visit my site.
Yeah, it drives me crazy. I've have had some images that just knock me out full
screen, that I haven't put up on the web
'cause they look so crappy small.
Oh well, until the crash, revolution, natural or environmental disaster,
bandwidths will go up and screens will get more
pixels. :-)
Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|