Ken
I agree, but it's still only a feeling rather than a proper survey.
On that subject, I have just been looking at DPReview's comparisons between the
GF-1 and the E-PL2; the latter seems to have the better scores where it matter
(although I would continue to use my Panny 20/1.7 on an Oly m4/3 camera).
I also checked the review for the Canyon 60D and it looks pretty good. But it
has its quirks, as do the Olympus DSLRs, and I would change to the E-5 if the
price came down from ridiculous to slightly over-priced, notwithstanding the
camera's limitations. One reason for my sticking with Oly is that the lenses
are excellent, and I already have the ones that I want (12-60, 50-200 and
macro).
And what are you doing up at this hour? :-)
Chris
On 13 Feb 2011, at 06:30, Ken Norton wrote:
> Well, Chris, you may be right. But it is rather interesting that on an
> Olympus list that when it comes to discussions on Olympus' latest and
> greatest the sound of crickets is deafening.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|