Wot 'e said.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 01/02/2011, at 1:31 AM, manuel viet wrote:
> Otherwise, handling balance is perfect, and of course, as everybody can tell
> and has already reported, image quality is... supernatural ? ... magical ?
> ...
> (my english is missing expletives to convey what I really think). The only
> meaningful comparison I have at hand is, the pictures are as good as the ones
> I made with my Canonet New QL17, if not better. So sharp you can still cut
> your eyballs on them at 100% viewing, with incredible contrast and colours.
> It's head and shoulders above anything else you can attach to µ4:3 bodies, to
> the point where you can spot at first glance images made with the panny 20 in
> collections of pictures once you have a bit of training.
>
> This lens is the center of my µ4:3 system. I could change everything around
> it, swap bodies or whatever, but the 20 is truly unique. I think if the look
> was a complete mismatch with Olympus bodies, I would petition Olympus to
> death
> for remedy instead of Panasonic. Yes, it's *that* good.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|