But "apparently so" is reality for in focus. If the CoC is so small
that you can't see the Airy disc then all of the image is in focus and
you can't see any of the "micro-bokeh" you purport to exist.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/17/2011 4:07 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Except that everything is not in focus - just apparently so. Which
> means that the areas just off focus will be rendered in a particular
> way which may be what gives a particular lens its character - so how
> about we invent the term 'micro-bokeh' and start a whole new area of
> lensgeek discourse? :-) Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> On 17/01/2011, at 11:34 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> Agreed. The definition of bokeh relates to the appearance of
>> out-of-focus parts of the image. If everything is in focus there
>> is no bokeh.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|