As you're no doubt aware, you and I have much different views on energy
cost to the planet.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/17/2011 7:38 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> Chuck
>
> I wasn't referring to the cost to you, but to the planet. That's
> 117w more than a picture uses (after allowing for its manufacture, of
> course).
>
> Chris
>
> On 17 Jan 2011, at 12:21, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>> I just bought a 32" set which draws 117 watts. My incremental cost
>> for electricity is about 10 US cents per KWH or 1.17 cents/hour.
>> Hardly seems an excessive waste to me.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|