On 1/11/2011 5:30 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> . . . For instance, the Packhorse Bridge does have quite a range of
> brightnesses, but it's manageable for me (i.e. I like it :-)). If you have
> time you might wish to see that image on Picasaweb:
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/vc-9CklBq2D23_vG8tRDAedxpYFNEeSAmNLIvDuRXhs?feat=directlink
>
> . . . and see if it still shows the problems you hint at. All the latest
> images on that blog are on that album.
>
> I should be interested in your thoughts (or anyone else's if they have the
> time).
Hey, tough lighting, but even in the JPEG, very little lost, I imagine the
slightly blown highlights might be
recoverable in RAW processing.
I do prefer it with the mid tones and upper shadows lifted and the brightest
highlights toned down a bit. Also without
the car and sign. :-)
- <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Barker/Packhorse_Bridge.htm>
As usual, if the treatment is too much, imagine something in between.
Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|