I should clarify my wife was not the original source but they were
discussing a recent study on her course about vitamin absorbtion.
"research (source my wife who is studying to be a dietician) that says"
On 07/01/2011 08:58, SwissPace wrote:
> I have a very good science education and because of this I don't like
> the concept of irradiated food or come to think of it microwaved food,
> it may be accepted by the masses but that doesn't make it correct. We
> often hear about this food being good and that food being bad, but then
> then a while later another report refutes the claims so in reality noone
> really knows what is good or bad - because it is too complex to understand.
>
> The other reason is there are far too many variables which cannot be
> controlled, so when they say a certain people live longer because they
> eat fish not every variable is accounted for e.g simple examples
> being how is the food prepared, what else is it eaten with, what drinks
> are consumed is it irradiated, fresh or has it been frozen etc etc.
>
> I understand many things but freely admit to not fully understanding
> what would be removed form our food by irradiation, all I know is that
> most of us might not be getting it right , take for example the recent
> research (source my wife who is studying to be a dietician) that says
> vitamin pills are not effective so hence a waste of time and money ,
> sure they have the vitamins in chemical form but the body doesn't
> absorb them as well as it does when they are real natural and in food -
> why is that? .
>
>
>
> On 06/01/2011 16:03, Bill Pearce wrote:
>> we wouldn't need poison if we could have irradiated food, but all the old
>> maids with poor science education won't let us.
>>
>>
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|