| Subject: | Re: [OM] Gasp! (OT) |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:16:49 -0600 |
Because when an officer does dicharge his/her weapon, the determination has already been made that the situation is deadly and just wounding the assailant has a lower rate of success in actually stopping the assailant from succeeding. AG (Tazers on stun) Schnozz -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Gasp! (OT), |-o-| |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Gasp! (OT), |-o-| |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Gasp! (OT), Chris Barker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Gasp! (OT), Charles Geilfuss |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |