Subject: | Re: [OM] Jeweler's camera |
---|---|
From: | "C.H.Ling" <ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:56:29 +0800 |
Ah! you are right, I just notice that. C.H.Ling ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 4:34 AM Subject: Re: [OM] Jeweler's camera > But one does not have to equalize the reproduction ratio by capturing > the same size image on film or sensor. One can do it in post processing > as long as the lens is capable of a sufficiently small CoC to withstand > the additional magnification. That was what I did in my first example. > I used 100mm at 10 feet with a CoC of 30 lines/mm and a 50mm lens at > 10 feet with a suitable CoC for a 4/3 sensor of 60 lines/mm. Using a > conventional DOF calculator shows that the 50mm has much more DOF. > > Chuck Norcutt > > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Vulgar Volga, Larry G. Griffin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] OM Monarch, usher99 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Jeweler's camera, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Jeweler's camera, usher99 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |