I dunno anything about it but I love my two AT-X Pro Tokinas... a
28-80/2.8 and 80-200/2.8. They take nice pictures and between shoots
you can use them as hammers if you want to moonlight in carpentry.
The "AT-X Pro" moniker is a quality distinction mark like Series 1 was
to Vivitar or "L" is to Canon.
No provision for filters I see but that's hardly a problem these days
with digital. I didn't know about this lens at all. It looks like it
fills a hole at the bottom range of my AT-X Pro line of lenses.
Chuck Norcutt
On 12/18/2010 5:07 PM, SwissPace wrote:
> Ken Rockwell has a review of the 16-28 tokina, he likes it very much on
> the nykon. but I can't find any others, what is the general opinion his
> reviews, are they accurate.
>
> Apologies for the typos in my previous email, I accidentally sent it
> before proof reading it
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|