| Subject: | Re: [OM] Deconvolution - No Free Lunch. Is there a $$$ lunch? [was IMG: Nathan's PAW 48: wine, social life and light] |
|---|---|
| From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Dec 2010 14:14:47 -0600 |
Moose, I had my preferences as to which one I like out of the three sets. But the problem is, that the processing I liked for THIS shot wouldn't fly for other types of pictures. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Engineer, was FrankenCamera, Bill Pearce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Wonderful man made sights with nature., Chris Barker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Deconvolution - No Free Lunch. Is there a $$$ lunch? [was IMG: Nathan's PAW 48: wine, social life and light], Bill Pearce |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Deconvolution revealed, Moose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |