[OM] So here's the deal...

[usher99]

Eagle eye Moose writes:

I've never had a problem focusing with the 50/3.5. Ergo no need for the 
expense
of the f2.

One advantage is the 50F2 macro has less edgy  bokeh in many but not 
all conditions. That I can testify to.
It's "rendering" is slightly different than the 50/1.4  when used for 
non-macro but I wouldn't want to be called upon to exactly describe or 
quantify that.
Some of that may be flatter field, but I don't know.
Mike


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/