I did that too (some may be VERY surprised to hear). The flaw is in the scale.
It is possible to be quite extroverted in some contexts and introverted in
others. It has to be scaled against other factors like the specific social
environment.
Gawd I can remember when Meyers-Briggs was the flavour of the year. Applied all
over by poorly trained assessors who relied on a rule and procedure manual.
Personally I thought that the lie scale was pretty easy to spot and that with
some care, you could bias the result in just about any direction. Simplistic
twaddle.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 05/12/2010, at 10:22 AM, Moose wrote:
> There's one on-line Meyers-Briggs imitator on which I score exactly 50-50 on
> the introversion/extroversion scale.
> Obviously flawed; if one understands Jung's own definitions, as opposed to
> popular views, I'm clearly an introvert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|