I think you're confusing journalism with literature! :-)
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 20/11/2010, at 9:18 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> I wasn't going to say, Andrew, but it does look rushed. There are several
> tell-tale signs: punctuation, terminology ("thin" DOF), vague assertions.
> But we, your fans, are happy . . . :-)
>
> Chris
>
> On 19 Nov 2010, at 20:48, Andrew Fildes wrote:
>
>> Could be better I agree but I was rushed. I think those who will be reading
>> it will be reasonably knowledgeable - or they wouldn't be there. This is the
>> style I usually use for reviews - a bit of history followed by some
>> description and then a user report all in a rather terse style. Seems to
>> work.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|