Nevertheless, they had the 35mm equivalent of 70, 100 and 170mm covered which
they could do without changing lenses. The 6x17 is an interesting addition.
Clearly not cheap coverage.
Chuck Norcutt
> -------Original Message-------
> From: Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [OM] Deconstructing photo gear
> Sent: Nov 15 '10 23:45
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:22 PM, <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Watch many wedding and event photographers. They're likely equipped with
> two camera bodies with one bearing a wide to short tele zoom and the other a
> short to long tele zoom.
>
> Saw what I think was a husband/wife photo team at an obviously large
> and luxurious Chinese wedding. Both had e3s, his with 14-35 and hers
> 7-14. Both also had second cameras, hers an e1 with the 50 macro, his
> a Panny G1 with a Russian 85. No long zooms visible.
>
> The two assistants had tripods, elaborate lighting equipment, and several
> large cameras, big Fuji rangefinders and a 6x17 rig.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|