Indeed! I don't think that I should bother with the effort of opening the door
to the place.
But I'm surprised that Nathan was allowed to photograph any exhibits; or was it
because they were worried that not many people would come to exhibition and
hoped that photography would publicise the "work".
I suspect that, in that part of the world, viewers are less likely to be
shocked so the authors have to be more shocking than the last; but it doesn't
work for me as art, for the most part.
Chris
On 7 Nov 2010, at 22:35, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> Yup - that qualifies as shock art alright.
> Guaranteed to offend almost everybody.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|