Subject: | Re: [OM] iPhone et al |
---|---|
From: | Wayne Harridge <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:13:44 +1100 |
> Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > More overhead? Yes but probably not terribly significant. I probably > shouldn't go there since I haven't done this sort of stuff for about 20 > years but I think the DLLs that are loaded (the bulk of the application > logic) will be shared by the multiple process instances. > That's my understanding of how most windows apps are structured. ...Wayne Wayne Harridge http://lrh.structuregraphs.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Think you've got image data storage problems?, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] iPhone et al, Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] iPhone et al, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] iPhone et al, Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |