Thanks for those, Moose. I do use exposure compensation a lot of the time, but
I had not realised that that would do the trick with the problem red flowers.
I've also found that that I can navigate through most of your galleries with a
click, so I don't have to scroll to the very bottom of your displays to find
the next image.
On 11 Oct 2010, at 04:50, Moose wrote:
> On 10/8/2010 10:48 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
>> I have often found that to be the result with that sort of poppy.
>
> Sure. And yet - it's avoidable. Exposure compensation is there for reasons,
> and bright red, orange and/or yellow flowers
> is one of them. ;-)
>
> I've posted a couple of these before, but it's still true that such flowers
> in direct sun may be successfully captured,
> even in direct sun, without blown red channel, even with a small sensor, and
> thus lower DR, camera such as the G11.
>
> With 5D.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=SFBayArea/BlakeHouse/20090710&image=_MG_6682ia.jpg>
> -
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=IATMS&image=_MG_9062cria.jpg>
>
Lovely shots!
> I don't think I've posted these before, bright, direct June sunlight with
> G11.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=California/Sonoma_Glen_Ellen&image=IMG_0813ptlcr.jpg>
> -
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=California/Sonoma_Glen_Ellen&image=IMG_0820iia.jpg>
>
They have come out well.
> I know I have shots of California poppies around ... They can be shot without
> blocked reds.
> <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Tech/Misc&image=CRW_2484criamask.jpg>
> Sure, it takes
> paying a little attention, but are we all just snapshooters? :-D
Yes, very nicely captured.
Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
