The wedding dress and veil in question shot by me before the wedding.
OM5D with Zuiko 24/2.8
<http://www.chucknorcutt.com/Wedding%20dress%20&%20veil/img_3172e%20profile_adoramalustre.htm>
On 10/6/2010 12:49 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>
>> I haven't seen any of the in-church photos but I've seen the outdoor
>> stuff which was OK. Except the mother was very distraught in that
>> certain key photos she had very explicitly requested were never taken.
>> In particular, there isn't a single photo that shows the bride's full
>> (and lengthy) train.
>>
>
> What you are describing about the flash usage is EXACTLY what I'm seeing
> this year. But come to think of it... It's also exactly what I've been doing
> quite a bit of this year too. I like the look, but it has issues--so many
> issues in fact, that it forces post-production editing on the photos and
> frequently it, ahem, encourages converting to monochrome.
>
> As to missing the bride's train... I'm screwed up on that very thing one
> time by failing to get one full-length shot. Big mistake. You only make that
> one once.
>
> There are two methods I've seen with multiple shooters. One method is where
> each shooter is getting everything, the other method is where one shooter
> gets the key shots and the second shooter gets the secondary angles and
> stuff the main shooter is too busy to get. I would never encourage the first
> method because you either get double of everything or you miss something
> because you are expecting the other shooter to have gotten it.
>
> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|