Another thing that looked odd to me was MTF graphs at 30 and 10 lpmm. I
think those are typical for 35mm. I should think one would want
equivalent performance of about 45 and 15 lpmm for an APS-C size sensor.
Chuck Norcutt
On 9/20/2010 12:51 PM, Jeff Keller wrote:
> Oh yes, that makes sense. Thank you.
> Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: C.H.Ling [mailto:ch_photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Subject: Re: [OM] why can't Oly do this:
>
> 0.5x is based on a 23mm (35mm equ.) lens, it is huge when compared to normal
>
> APS sensor DSLR, they are usually 0.85x with a 50mm lens (~75-80mm equ.)
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Keller"<om-list@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Also "Optical Viewfinder 0.5X magnification with approx. 90% frame
>> coverage".
>> Perhaps running the optical view through the prism/combiner has
>> significant
>> light loss ...
>>
>> With an APS-C sized image at 0.5x magnification the apparent viewing
>> distance is likely very short. The camera is gorgeous, Fuji has made some
>> great lenses, but there may be some unacceptable tradeoffs.
>>
>> Jeff Keller
>>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|