Dear Ken,
I don´t fully agree with you with this point. Both lenses are lovely. You
can find a really good review here. He is Valentin Sama, no one in Spain
knows more than him about OM-SYSTEM and E-SYSTEM. Leica seems to be a little
bit better regarding to corner sharpness but I still prefer the Olympus
lens. Have a look to corner shading!!! I attach the Goolge translation. The
article has 11 pages:
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=es&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=es&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dslrmagazine.com%2Fpruebas%2Fpruebas-tecnicas%2Folympus-frente-a-leica.html
No other website has tested both lenses in the same conditions, cameras and
at the same time.
Dave
2010/9/17 Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 14-54 MFT lens. Fast AF, same speed as E-1 works for me. Please NO
> CHROMATIC
> > ABERRATION!!! A new sensor with the same dynamic range of E-1. (Ken we
> have
> > to publish E-1 dynamic range test!) I think many people will be amazed
> with
> > the results! KODAK is the only one! That´s it!!! I don´t need anything
> else.
>
> Oh, and as good as that 14-54 lens is, I don't mean to be difficult...
> But my PanaLeica 14-50 just takes it to another level. The 14-54 feels
> better and is easier to control, but the 14-50 is simply glorious. The
> contrast in the corners is the same as in the center. Oh, and no
> aberrations.
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|